Flightscope Mevo and Trackman are both popular launch monitors in 2021. But what are the main differences between them, and which out of the Mevo or Trackman is best suited for your needs? We have reviewed and compared these two in terms of data provided, clubhead and ball speed, launch angle, accuracy, distance, user experience, practice options, software, and price to find out exactly that. Ready to find out the answer? Keep reading.
In a hurry? Both the Flightscope Mevo and Trackman use radar technology to compute their numbers, but that is where comparisons end. In terms of Flightscope vs Trackman, the Trackman is far superior in terms of accuracy, software options, and games, but it’s also much more expensive. For the recreational golfer, the Mevo is an excellent product at an attractive price point.
Difference Between Flightscope Mevo and Trackman
|Best Value for Money||
|Much More Expensive||
Flightscope vs Trackman 2021: Differences Compared
Both the Flightscope Mevo and Trackman use radar to calculate the information they provide. As a result, neither is suitable for indoor use.
Both advise a distance of around 8 feet behind the ball and 12 to 15 feet in front of the ball, meaning that unless you have a large enough space you will not get accurate data with either. Photometric devices are best for indoor use.
For the price, the FS Mevo offers a lot of data, most of it very on-trend. Carry distance, clubhead speed, launch angle, spin rate, and apex time are just some of the information from both the ball and clubhead.
It is unusual to find a launch monitor that offers such a range of figures in this price bracket. The Trackman offers the same and a lot more, as it is designed more for teaching professionals, club fitters, and tour professionals.
The Trackman offers information from both the ball and clubhead as well as variables such as wind and weather. The question you need to ask whether you need all the extra information, as deciphering data from a Trackman requires high-level golf knowledge and training.
As both systems use the same measuring system, the results are similar. Which is best, the Flightscope Mevo or Trackman? Well, as the Trackman costs over 20 times more than the Flightscope, you would expect increased accuracy, and it sure does deliver.
However, the Flightscope Mevo is surprisingly accurate, with differences of between 2 and 5% on most shots vs the Trackman. It is most accurate on carry distances, which is probably the most important metric for practice purposes.
One problem with the Flightscope is that it is quite difficult to set-up properly, and that does hamper the accuracy. Unless the launch monitor is in the right position and flat, the data is somewhat tarnished. As such, it can be frustrating at the start of a practice session to know if your distances are correct or not.
As with the Data Provided section, the Trackman is superior, but again you need to ask how much accuracy do you need. If you are not able to consistently hit the middle of the clubface and control distance on a whim then the Flightscope Mevo is perfectly acceptable and will enhance your practice.
Finally, a comparative where the Flightscope Mevo Basic Model is best. It is much, much cheaper than the Trackman, and offers a lot for the price. The Trackman comes in at nearly 20 times the cost, or 5 times the price of the Mevo+, and is designed for a different type of user.
As such, it is better to compare the two in terms of value for money, and both deliver in this comparison. However, the Flightscope Mevo offers everything a recreational golfer needs to practice at home or on the range, so it trumps the Trackman in this category.
The Trackman is again better in this section. The first reason is that the Flightscope Mevo asks that you attach small, metallic stickers to the ball so it can track spin rates more easily. Whilst this will improve the figures you get, it is somewhat annoying.
Also, the Flightscope Mevo is very demanding in terms of placement, much more so than the Trackman. If it is slightly out of place it will provide inaccurate results or no results at all.
Both require the use of a tablet or computer for data illustration purposes and the Flightscope Mevo can also be used with an app on your smartphone.
It connects with Bluetooth so can be a little unreliable, but once paired it provides low energy data transfer that will lengthen your training time.
The Flightscope Mevo data is easier to read and understand as it does not include as much data. The phone or data screen provides a clear illustration of that and recent shots, as well as the data needed to quickly analyze the swing.
The Trackman has many more data options, which it provides in a tabular format without illustration. This is not as visually pleasing as the Flightscope, and the amount of data provided by the Trackman is also too much for most recreational golfers.
The Mevo has very few options, but the Mevo+ option is slightly more comparable to the Trackman. As such, this section will include information on both – Trackman vs Mevo+ and Mevo.
The Mevo is somewhat basic in its options, so it allows practice as if you were at a range, distance feedback, and video clipping. The Trackman offers these features and also allows the players swing to be videoed and edited too.
Also, the Trackman allows you to compare your swing with some of the world’s best so you can improve your game by comparison. This is an excellent feature and very interesting to see.
In terms of practice options, the Trackman offers over 100 courses, 3D game play, and the Trackman Cup, in which players can win up to $100,000.
The standard Mevo offers no such options, but the Mevo+ option, which is 5 times more expensive than the standard Mevo, offers 5 courses to play.
This is good, but not really comparable to what the Trackman offers. With the Trackman, you never need to leave your golf room.
The software options available with these 2 products vary hugely. The Trackman is a premium product, with a 1-year software package costing more than the Flightscope Mevo alone.
The Flightscope Mevo uses apps to illustrate and match the data with the unit, so they are limited in what they can do. A smartphone has much less computing power and capabilities than a tablet or laptop. The Flightscope Mevo + does offer a lot more, but is it necessary?
The Trackman software package is necessary to get the most out of the launch monitor, and you will not be able to access most of the more popular features without it.
This feels somewhat harsh given the cost of the launch monitor, but there is no doubting the quality of the software.
Once again, there is a discrepancy between which is the best and which is the best for you. The Trackman is again far better in the Mevo vs Trackman battle, but maybe it is too good. The Flightscope offers everything the normal golfer needs.
Flightscope Mevo+ Review
The Flightscope Mevo is an affordably priced launch monitor that offers everything a recreational golfer everything they need.
It has information on the ball and the clubhead that is accurately read using radar.
Also, you can record and edit videos taken by the unit.
- Provides Data on Ball and Clubhead
- Can record and edit videos
- Easy to use visuals
- Loses some accuracy indoors
- Set-up is hard work
- Requires metal stickers on balls
The Trackman is a premium product that offers accuracy and features at a price.
You can get data on nearly everything from the ball and clubhead, videos, and editing options with an easy to set-up unit.
You can also play over 100 courses from around the world and even take part in the Trackman Cup.
This is an excellent product for any golf professional, teacher, or aspiring professional.
- Highly accurate
- Lots of Data
- Usable indoors or outdoors
- Easy to set-up
- Requires golf knowledge/training
- Loses some accuracy indoors
Flightscope Mevo vs Trackman: And the winner is…
Well, they are both winners but in different markets. The recreational golfer looking to extend their practice time should choose the Flightscope Mevo as it offers everything they need at a great price point.
The golf professional, prospective tour player, analytical practicer, or super-rich should go for the Trackman, as it is the better product. However, most golfers do not need what it offers, making the Flightscope as worthy.
The Trackman has many more features, data points, and improved user experience. However, these come at a price, meaning that it goes past the point of accessibility for most. Whichever you choose, more practice will mean better golf, so make sure you get one of them.