Computer analysis is common nowadays, and golf simulators are an increasingly normal way for golfers to practice. Two popular simulators in 2020 are the SkyTrak and Foresight GC2, but which is better for your needs, SkyTrak or GC2, and what are the main differences between them? Let’s review and compare these two in terms of accuracy, data provided, user experience, distance, club head and ball speed, launch angle, practice options, club head data, launch monitor display, software, and price.
In a hurry? SkyTrak and Foresight GC2 are both excellent golf launch monitors and both will add to your practice. You will be able to get more accurate feedback as well as practice indoors or outdoors. In terms of SkyTrak vs Foresight GC2 the main difference between them is the price. The SkyTrak is much more affordable and suitable for the recreational golfer.
Differences Between SkyTrak and Foresight GC2
SkyTrak vs Foresight GC2: Differences Compared
Let’s analyze which is the best system using some key factors:
The SkyTrak system and GC2 use different technologies to determine their data. The most impressive system is the Foresight one, which has stereoscopic, high-resolution cameras that capture up to 10,000 frames per second as well as photometric data.
The SkyTrak uses only photometric data, which analyzes the ball after it is struck and records that data. Therefore, the Foresight GC2 will produce more data points than the SkyTrak.
The Foresight produces the data on a display that is attached to the unit. This data can also be shown on a screen should you create a complete golf simulator.
The SkyTrak system requires a tablet to be attached electronically to display the information.
The Foresight also offers an option to measure Head Measurement, which it uses to provide analysis on your swing as well as the ball. However, the SkyTrak only measures the ball, so it offers no feedback on the golfer’s swing.
Accuracy is very important to a golfer’s practice. There is nothing more disheartening than hitting a good or bad shot and getting obviously incorrect feedback.
The SkyTrak vs Foresight GC2 debate is moot as both use photometric data. However, the Foresight GC2 adds the data from the camera, so is more accurate than the SkyTrak system. Both systems are extremely accurate and will add to your practice.
The Foresight is better in two further ways. The Foresight GC2 has a wider range of vision, so will provide better feedback on mishits. (Although if you want this information is probably worth considering)
Secondly, as the Foresight GC2 system is self-leveling, it will always provide accurate data, whereas the SkyTrak system’s accuracy is dependent on the quality of the set-up.
As both systems use photometric data as the basis for the information they provide there is no difference between the two systems in terms of indoor and outdoor use.
The main difference again comes back to the self-leveling system on the Foresight GC2 which means that it is easier to get accurate data outside with that system.
Overall, independent reviews and this user’s experience was that the data provided was extremely similar from both systems.
Both of these systems are easy to use, but the Foresight GC2 system claims that you can be set-up from the box in less than 1 minute.
The self-leveling system is a big plus, especially for those who like to practice in multiple venues, including outdoors.
Those who practice on ranges or in the garden will know that the ground is rarely perfectly level. Therefore, if you want accurate data when you travel to different courses or driving ranges, the Foresight GC2 is well worth the extra money.
The GC2 also offers an “All-in-One” set up, with a ready to go display screen attached to the analysis unit.
Additionally, this has an audio function for those who need it. This eliminates the need for a separate laptop or tablet, although one can be added if you want to do that.
The SkyTrak system is focused on providing the data it provides as clearly as possible on the screen rather than the unit it offers it on.
SkyTrak offers only the most important details on the main screen in a very easy to understand format.
A major disadvantage of the SkyTrak (for me anyway) was the delay when the system was providing information. It takes around 5 seconds for the data to appear on the SkyTrak screen, whereas the Foresight GC2 system was almost instant.
This might not seem much but it does become annoying after a while, especially when “no data” is also occasionally provided.
Overall, the Foresight GC2 system is easier to use than the SkyTrak system.
Both systems provide a range of practice options. Firstly, there is the standard driving range option where the information makes it better than going to the range themselves.
They both offer important information prominently and offer different display options. Comparisons per shot, data compilation, and graphs showing ball dispersion are standard across both systems.
The SkyTrak system comes with a Game Improvement Plan extra, whereas the Foresight system is more designed for Golf Professionals as it offers a club-fitting option. Therefore, the SkyTrak system is better suited for recreational golfers looking to improve.
Both also offer “play options” with their software. SkyTrak offers 12 of the world’s best courses. However, the GC2 system software has over 80 courses as well as 50 3D courses and 19 short game areas.
The SkyTrak system is more fun, with options such as long-drive and nearest the pin competitions too.
The SkyTrak vs Foresight GC2 competition is not so much evident in this section, as it becomes clear they are designed for different markets. The Foresight GC2 is better for golf professionals whereas the SkyTrak is better for recreational golfers.
The latest Foresight GC2 is an excellent system that offers some of the best and most realistic golf experiences ever created.
It has 4K resolution graphics for some of the best courses in the world, allowing you to play these courses regularly from the comfort of your own home. Also, the 3D courses and practice area are an excellent feature that adds to the practice experience.
Another benefit of the Foresight system is that it offers gameplay against players from all over the world. This is also available on the SkyTrak system, but that offers fewer courses.
The Head Measurement Technology (HMT) available on the Foresight offers additional information related to the clubhead.
This allows the golfer to analyze more data and to compare the clubhead and ball measurements along with a video of the swing. This comprehensive package allows greater insight, but does reduce the usability for golfers with less golf knowledge.
The SkyTrak system is much cheaper than the Foresight GC2. SkyTrak retails at approximately $2000, which is not a base level price, but it is not as expensive as the Foresight GC2.
Although you do have to add on the costs of a tablet / laptop, it is still much less. The Foresight GC2 system costs closer to $10,000 so is much more expensive.
Also more expensive on the Foresight system is the software, with the latest FSX2020 software costing $3000 or $100 a month.
This is much more expensive than the SkyTrak software, whose most expensive option comes in at $350 a year.
You do get a lot more for your money from the Foresight GC2, but that comes at a cost not everyone can afford.
SkyTrak offers the accuracy of much more expensive golf simulators for less, making it affordable for those who don’t earn their living from the game.
It allows the keen practicer or someone who wants to play at home the chance to build a full golf simulator for an affordable price.
The usability, fun, accuracy, and software options are such that if they cover nearly every possible need for recreational golfers.
The feedback from practice is suitable for those serious about improving their game through analysis, and the 12 golf courses offer a fun, game play experience at some of the world’s best courses.
If you are looking for a value for money affordable home golf simulator, this is the best option for you.
- Highly Accurate for Full Shots
- Fun Practice Options
- Short game accuracy is not that good
- Small range of courses
Foresight GC2 Review
The Foresight GC2 is a high-quality premium golf launch monitor with a very good basic package and excellent extras.
It offers elite-level accuracy for both long game and short game so it is suitable for those who need exact data for their profession.
Also, it has extras such as the HMT which would allow professionals to analyze both the ball and clubhead behavior.
Despite the range of data available being large it is not as complicated as some other premium simulators.
Therefore, it does not require any specialist training to use, and the built-in display means that you don’t even need to attach a tablet to read the data.
The biggest benefit of the Foresight GC2 is the self-leveling technology which means it is easy to set up. You can as it says be set-up and ready to go inside a minute, with a bit of practice.
The main downside is the price, which is much higher than the SkyTrak, for both the unit and software packages. This may make it prohibitively expensive for some, but you do get what you pay for.
- Extremely Accurate
- Very Easy to Use
- Built-in Display
- Excellent Software Packages
- Add ons can be complicated
SkyTrak vs GC2: And the winner is…
The Foresight GC2 is the best option but the cost is far more expensive than the SkyTrak system.
If you are a golf professional, teacher, or club-fitter then the Foresight GC2 is the best option as the accuracy is higher and the add-ons such as the HMT offer a lot more than the SkyTrak. Not all recreational golfers though do not need such accuracy and data.
Both can be used equally well indoors and outdoors, although the Foresight GC2 is better due to the self-leveling technology. Both are also easy to use, and the Foresight’s built-in screen is as good as the SkyTrak’s visuals are clear.