The GCQuad and Trackman are both great launch monitors. But what are the main differences between them, and which out of the GCQuad or Trackman is best suited for your needs? We’ve reviewed and compared these two in terms of accuracy, data provided, club head and ball speed, launch angle, distance, user experience, practice options, software, and price to find out exactly that.
The GCQuad and Trackman are premium golf launch monitors. They both provide highly accurate data on the ball and clubhead, but they do so using different methods. Both are expensive and provide an array of information suitable for golf professionals and teachers. These are serious pieces of equipment, so be ready to invest time and money into your game if you purchase either.
Check the price of Trackman here
Differences Between GCQuad and Trackman
GCQuad vs Trackman 2024: Differences Compared
Both the GCQuad and the Trackman are high-level products designed for those who are serious about golf improvement. As such, they provide data on the clubhead and the ball in the data they provide.
The only difference between the two is how the data is collected. The GCQuad uses a Quadroscopic Camera system, which uses 4 cameras to generate a 3D map. From this imagery, it calculates the data you need to work on your golf game.
The Trackman however uses a radar system that measures the ball from its movement. It also tracks the clubhead on its full journey, so you get the same data as with the GCQuad.
Both provide lots of useful data, perhaps too much for the recreational golfer. If you possess a wealth of golf knowledge, however, the data will give you a lot to work on.
The GCQuad unit provides some of the most important data on the unit itself, which could be helpful for recreational golfers. The Trackman also provides simplified data viewing options, but only on the tablet or computer.
The GCQuad and Trackman are highly accurate. They provide realistic and consistent data on all golf shots, which allows you to work on your game with confidence.
The only real difference between the two is that the GCQuad is equally accurate in any space you use it in. The Quadroscopic measurement cameras take over 6,000 frames per second, so the information they need immediately can be measured after the strike.
The Trackman uses a radar system so requires up to 20 feet of space in front of and behind the golfer. If the Trackman does not have enough space the measurements can become a little bit inaccurate.
Both are also accurate for short game and putts, which is not the case with some less expensive units. As such, if you choose the gameplay options, you will not be frustrated. To compare in a like for like GCQuad vs Trackman, the GCQuad is better as it offers accuracy in any size of space.
The GCQuad provides a better user experience than the Trackman as it provides a display in the launch monitor itself, as well as the option to hook it up to a computer or tablet for more details.
The unit has a small display that gives you the key information, as you may have seen used by Bryson Dechambeau. The only downside is that the connection to the computer must be made using a cable, mainly because the quantity of information is so large.
The Trackman however requires a connection with a tablet or computer and does not offer a display on the unit. However, a connection can be made using BlueTooth, so the unit is more portable than the GCQuad.
The GCQuad and Trackman are both easy to set-up. Indoors and outdoors, they provided data with minimum set-up time and leveling, which can be a problem with some cheaper devices.
The graphics provided by both systems should you decide to use the indoor game play options are also high-quality. The ball flight shown is realistic, and the options great fun. In terms of the GCQuad vs Trackman, the GCQuad offers a better user experience.
The GCQuad and Trackman both offer a wide range of practice options. For basic, range-type practice, they both offer accuracy, a wide range of data, video capture with editing facilities, and much more. You can also use them indoors or outdoors, and they are both portable.
However, it is away from the range options that these launch monitors differentiate themselves from the competition. The GCQuad and Trackman offer extremely realistic golf simulator experiences for some of the best courses in the world.
Trackman’s top-level package includes over 100 courses, many of which are in 3D. They also offer 3D short game practice. The GCQuad does not offer as many courses, but those it does are some of the most famous, including St Andrews, Pebble Beach, Spyglass Hill, and many others. If these options don’t make you practice then nothing ever will.
There are a range of software options for the GCQuad and the Trackman. The GCQuad’s options are more individualized, allowing you to build your own, personalized system.
The Trackman however offers 3 levels of package, including the premium level featuring the courses and Trackman Cup. You can do more with the GCQuad software, but the cost is much higher.
As the software is excellent, the speed that it shows the data is speedy. Also, the amount of data computed in such a short time illustrates the power behind the systems.
The software itself requires a tablet or computer to link with due to the amount of information included. The quality of graphics also demand high-quality display units to get the most out of the game play experience.
Both the GCQuad and Trackman are very expensive options. You will pay at least five figures for either unit and spend over four figures on an annual basis for software.
Both systems offer a full range of options and are becoming increasingly essential for golf professionals, teachers, or driving ranges. However, as most will also need to construct a golf room or outdoor net for use at home, the costs are somewhat prohibitive.
The GCQuad uses a quadroscopic camera that takes over 6000 frames per second to calculate information on the golf ball and clubhead.
It is a premium product that provides extremely accurate data and a range of fantastic practice options.
The courses available for game play are world-famous and provided with stunning graphics. In addition to linking to a computer, the launch monitor provides key data on the unit itself.
This is an excellent product that can be used indoors and outdoors, and will enhance anyone’s practice and golf.
- Extremely accurate data
- Equally good indoors or outdoors
- Does not need much space
- Shows information on the unit itself
- Provides a wealth of data
- Fantastic game play options
- Very expensive
- Data requires golf knowledge to interpret
The Trackman is a highly accurate golf launch monitor that uses radar to generate information about the ball and clubhead.
It can be used indoors or outdoors, but requires space in front and behind the player to calculate the data.
The software options are well packaged, with over 100 courses available for gameplay. The data provided is plentiful and is available quickly.
This is a high-quality product that will improve anyone’s golf game.
- Extremely accurate
- Usable indoors or outdoors
- Provides lots of information
- Excellent Game Play Options
- Very expensive
- No information on the launch monitor
- Needs space so not as accurate in a small indoor space
GCQuad vs Trackman: And the winner is…
The GCQuad is the best option as it is better in a small number of key areas. Firstly, the launch monitor itself shows the key data, which makes it much easier to use for the player.
Secondly, the quadroscopic cameras allow accurate data to be measured in a small space, whereas the trackman requires more space. The GCQuad is more expensive, but with both units costing five figures, this is not as important a difference as with launch monitors in lower price bands.
The Trackman is an excellent product and offers accuracy, lots of data, portability, and fantastic game play options. However, the GCQuad golf simulator offers all these and more, and is the best option.
Table of Contents